Mountain Buzz banner

1 - 2 of 2 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
47 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
Colorado isn't the only state to have legislation to restrict access to streams on the docket.

The Utah House has passed HB141 which will give private landowners the right to cut off access to streams in Utah.

Streams with 10 years of proven (who determines this???) recreational use will remain open to the public. Sure!

Information on the current bill status is on the Salt Lake Tribune web site-- Utah House votes to curb stream access - Salt Lake Tribune
 

·
Sponsoring Vendors
Joined
·
81 Posts
Last week American Whitewater informed Utah members that a landmark legislative battle is playing out in Utah regarding the rights of paddlers to traverse the state's rivers. A 2008 court case clarified that existing Utah law supports the public's right to fish and paddle rivers, including the right to touch the bed and banks. In response, legislators have sought to pass new laws that redefine the rights of the public.

The bill that was the most reasonable and least damaging to paddlers (House Bill 80), stream access bill, failed in a house floor vote yesterday. HB80 had been amended, and then substituted with another version of the bill that changed key elements, especially the definition of the "bed" of the stream. The vote was not even close, 23 (yes) - 50 (no) - 2 (absent).

Another bill has emerged as extremely anti-paddling (House Bill 141). HB141, the "anti public access bill", is moving ahead even though it has been substituted and circled on the House floor. The vote was 50 (yes) - 25 (no) - 0 (absent). This bill seeks to undermine the previous State Supreme Court decisions for public access to rivers.

Please look up and call your representative, and/or the representative for the rivers that you paddle and let them know that you are strongly opposed to HB141.
 
1 - 2 of 2 Posts
Top