Mountain Buzz banner
41 - 60 of 77 Posts
Helio, thanks for sharing, great post! I think you are on your way to becoming a stellar paddler. I agree with all your points and it is great to see the attitude you have towards such a great sport. Good luck in the future and don't forget paddle where you can breathe.
Gary
 
Helio, you have had a great year but the one thing I would add is that I think the use of the WW park helped you and Jeremiah move up quite quickly this year. The addition of the Pueblo whitewater park seemed to help many paddlers progress this year. We have used that area as a training tool this year and I think it has been very successful and I thank the people of Pueblo that pushed this project.
 
JMack, and anyone else.

My point, like Gary said, is that it is all relative to each paddler. I assume that I am only at risk if I miss a line, just as a class III paddler is only at risk if they miss a line. Consequences are a mute point if you clean a rapid.

That being said I do respect a paddler that doesn't want to risk it as much as another. Some paddlers will only run something if they will clean it 24/25 times, or 49/50 times, and that automatically means they will probably be running easier whitewater. That is part of the beauty of kayaking, making personal choices about how much risk you wish to take.

Assuming you miss a line, I don't think its completely correct to assume that class V offers larger consequences than class III. In other sports this is correct. Take snowboarding in a terrain park. Every rider knows that coming up short on a jump will hurt less on a 10' gap as opposed to a 50' gap, and injuries will likely result from the larger. However, since kayaking is performed on such forgiving terrain (water) the result of a missed line is often the same, you swim something scary, and miraculously make it through just fine. Whitewater injuries are rare because there is no middle ground, you are either unhurt (small cuts and bruises) or you are dead.

In years and years of paddling I have yet to be able to judge which missed line will kill you and which one won't. I've heard of people falling off the right side of Zute Chute (40 footer in Inner Crystal Gorge, solid class V) and coming out just fine even though it looks like death. I've also heard of people dieing on class IV rapids, that boaters routinely run (one last year in this state). Therefore I find it tough to believe that a missed line on Class V will more likely mean you will die (remember, we usually don't get hurt) as opposed to a missed line on class III.

To contradict myself, when injuries do happen they are more likely to happen on class V. But honestly, how often do you really get hurt by a river feature. (Shoulder dislocation means your body got teaked, not that you hit something. Same with tendonitis, etc.) In 13 years of paddling and numerous missed lines and swims, I have only had two injuries that stopped me from paddling for a set amount of time. And only one of those (jacked ribs) resulted from a missed line. The other (broken back) was on a line that I went for and had run cleanly before. Neither involved a swim.

JMack, don't take this personally (I can be a little blunt). Just trying to explain my point of view a little better. We definetly agree on a lot of things. I think that I view things a little differently than most though, when it comes to evaluating risk.

Gary, I'd be interested in your take on what I just said, since you have much more experience than I do in the class V realm. And anyone elses...

Sorry, this should be a seperate thread, but it started under this one...

Awesome posts! And yes Marko, friends don't let friends wear tight neoprene! haha
 
i move my post to a new thread in respect for this thread.

helio- garye is right, you are on the road to becoming a stellar paddler. Keep learning! Mike Brown, and Pikes Peak have some great programs.

gh- you are right on about play parks helping a paddlers skills. The more you playboat the more you roll. the more you roll the better it gets. playboating builds paddle dexterity and your sense of awareness. This awareness is created by flipping upside down in so many different ways, and after doing it for awhile you will start to get a sense of where you are and what paddle blade you need to use to hip snap. And what a better place to do this-a safe nearly controlled play park.

later
 
Regarding Mark's comment about PPWC, in my opinion, what Pikes Peak Whitewater Club has done very well is reduce the barriers to entry into the sport, by providing pool sessions in the winter to help beginners come out and learn basic strokes and how to roll. We follow that up with structured beginner trips to build on the basic skills and apply them to the river. and last year for the first time, our ACA certified instructors ran courses for club members by enrollment to further aid new paddlers to learn and build on the basics.

Consider the importance of the support network as well, that helps beginners become self-sufficient with finding paddling partners once they have some of the basics down. With all the sponsored activities we have for beginners it helps them network with others at their level to put trips together on their own. I think the new Colorado Kayakers group for new paddlers did some nice work in this area last season as well.

Next season, PPWC will build on what they've done well in the past and add some activities to help class 3 paddlers gain additional skills to move competently into more challenging water, get more capable overall, and just enjoy paddling more. Check out our pro clinics, for one example of how we are approaching this. These clinics can help intermediate and advanced paddlers get a picture of what good fundamentals can open up for them and as such may stimulate some longer-term boaters to consider the value of more advanced lessons.

These are some examples of the role a club can play to attract and retain people in the sport. That doesn't mean that all clubs will play that role, but PPWC, in my opinion has the leadership and committment of a core group of members to make this type of contribution.

From my perspective, if we attract more people to the sport we all benefit, the manufacturers can make more innovative products, the dealers and schools have a larger client base enabling them the opportunity to keep prices reasonable, and the organizations that support River issues important to all of us, such as AW, ACA and American Rivers have a stronger membership base.

Mike

http://www.pikespeakwhitewaterclub.com/
 
Discussion starter · #47 ·
I am amazed at the responce this thread is getting.... Thanks everyone!

A couple of point that I feel need adressed as to the way Boaters think VS non boaters

There are few on river venues that a non boater no matter what age they are can be exposed to whitewater kayaking. Remember I am talking from the non boaters standpoint that I talked to over the summer.

One is slalom, where people can see boaters using skills and tenique to move thru whitewater in a somewhat non threating manner, think the Golden Slalom series.
The next is a Rodeo, Where non boaters might/do think that looks hard, traped in a hole/rapid flipping over and over. To most non boaters that is their biggest fear stuck in a boat getting flipped, I heard this many times from the people watching the playboaters at Golden.
Another is somewhere like Gorefest or Pine Creek race, what I would refer as a video venue due to the size of the water and the possiable carnage factor, not a good place to get a non boater convinced that boating might be for them.

About Kayaking not growing due to no resorts, That was brought up at the WW symposium in Glenwood and I think that is not a valid point. First kayaking doesn't lend it's self to a resort setting like skiing does unless its from a playboat stand point.
But it can be looked at like this, Colorado does have 3-4 kayaking resorts already in place. Durango, Buena Vista/Salida and Glenwood Springs, you can include Golden in this too.
The Industry just needs to realize this and market it this way. Rivers already in place and hotels in place resturants there too, even camping, sounds like a resort to me. And it seems to be working for the Rafting company's.

About Snowboarding growing due to the Mtn Dew/X games mind set that is just not true, the Ski resorts used to not allow snowboarders and they were seeing a decline in dollar/numbers that were going to resorts that allowed boarding, dad and mom skiied but the kids snowboarded so that was a no brainer for the resorts. Then when the Olympics turned up their nose at Snowboarding and Skateboarding the X Games were born.

When I use the Mountain Dew crew reference, you know the jackasses from the commercials, itÂ’s all those guyÂ’s that give crap to the boaters that donÂ’t run the hardcore like they do, or think they do. You know, youÂ’ve seen the posts aimed at the people posting about running Grizzly and DeckerÂ’s and such. It's kind of like the weekend Harley rides throwin vibe to jap bike riders.


It does seem to me that even though kayaking has been around forever the industry/business of kayaking is in those awkward preteen years. I watched the same thing happen to the SCUBA industry back in the late 70's early 80's, during the change from the macho diver sport it was to the family lifestyle it is today.
By that I mean what you were talking about regarding "who are the demographics of kayaking"

After talking with several employees from different stores the biggest change they told me they have seen in the last few years other than boat design has been in the number of women getting involved in kayaking. And not doing so due to a boyfriend/husband but for themselves. That change seems to always signal a new era for any activity, with womenÂ’s involvement then comes family and so on.
As far as the Front Range Kayaker consumers they tend to be from all across the board from what I noticed during the pool sessions this past winter, paddling at Golden all season and from the customers I see coming thru the door. They span from, the broke collage kid looking for used gear at a deal price to get into the sport, the single guy/girl with some disposable income but not a lot, to the DR. and his wife looking to enjoy an activity during the off ski season and everyone in between.
One of the things that the kayak Industry needs to learn from demographics is that for the business to grow EVERYONE that comes thru the door needs to succeed at learning how to roll and have a good time on the river.
It is not the customer that is coming in the door that will make the kayaking business grow it is getting all the ones in that donÂ’t. And for that to happen the image of kayaking needs to change from, itÂ’s hard to learn and dangerous, to, its fun to learn and relatively safe if you boat at your comfort level.

I have seen the guide lines that the ACA uses for teaching beginners to paddle and that is part of what made me start thinking about how kayaking is taught, that and talking to several Instructors about their methodology. It seems to me that the ACA has a set list of skills to learn but no real method about how to approach teaching them.
After spending 20+ years as a SCUBA Inst. teaching Instructors and working with the students that everyone including themselves had given up on I am wondering why kayaking is taught the way it is.
“Read that” blind to learn a breath hold muscle memory skill, and an out and back paddle skill drill.
WouldnÂ’t the student be better served by having to paddle around some buoys in the lake/pool sessions that simulate the rocks they will be maneuvering around in their river classes, and using learning aids to work on developing the muscle memory and to help stop the diving paddle problem like I was having.

Thanks again everyone for helping me with this project.
 
This past summer was my first season boating. I started with some pool sessions last winter, got my flat water roll down pat, then headed out to moving water. Needless to say, I got worked for most of April and May. The place that helped me the most was Union Chutes. I REALLY learned how to roll, ferry, and brace by messing around in the holes and currents. After spending multiple weeks getting worked in the play holes, I was able to take my newfound abilities (and confidence) out to the rivers. I highly recommend every new student to spend ample time in play parks before they decide to venutre out to bigger water. It is forgiving enough that a possible swim isn't intimidating, but has features that a new boater can learn the basics. Not to mention, hopping into a man-made surf hole is a whole lot of fun when every other aspect of boating was either difficult or painful.
 
Kyle, I think you're dead on. Consequences, are consequences. The result can be the same in a missed class 3 line to a missed class 5 line. You figure most drownings are due to compression drownings (swimming in a rapid) where, as most of you know you are under water 75% of the time while swimming.

Like I said in a earlier post, when you are in the water you are never truely safe, that is why I get out and yard sale when I decide to pull. People have this theory that class 5 is so much more dangerous then class 3. I believe as Kyle, that paddling is realitive to the paddler, class 3 is dangerous and scary to a person that is coming up through the ranks, and yes more people die at this level than any other, Why? They have'nt been trained or experienced what nature has to offer. The first time I swam in the liquid frieght train, I came out and was like holy shit!


So now you go to the class 5 realm where training, judgement and decision making is critical and you have experienced people, making educated decisions based on experience and their ability. People who know how to cut out the variables they can control, like running, walking, can I do the moves this rapid will demand? Sure class 5 swims are dangerous, yet how many fat, smoking out of shape people do you see in that realm? You look at most of the class 5 and the main danger is swimming until you come to cutting edge class 5. Class 5 is more intense than 3, but for the prepared mind it feels the same as an up and comer swimming a 3, not to mention the up and comer is in the water alot longer than I am.

It doesn't matter what class you boat, only that you are out there.

If you never want class 5, do you not enjoy kayaking as much as someone who does, of course not. We all love to be out on our programs in nature, as nature is one of the things that is so much bigger than you. It makes you feel so small and in awe of what you're doing and seeing. Than it gives you the reassurance of how lucky you are to experience life and moments on the water. Not to mention the people you share these moments in time with, all quality.

The best way I feel to enjoy this sport is to learn to roll, from there everything else will come easy. You are comfortable and are able to work on many more things. Also, learn the sweep roll and throw the c to c in the river as it sucks. Ras said people are afraid to hit their head, ect. If you cannot roll, it will be more than your head hitting rocks, not to mention, you now arrive in a unknown environment with dangers riding the liquid frieght train.

Gary
 
Cutch-

I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree a bit. You can definitely get a foot entrapment in class III and drown, I just think its way less likely than from a missed line in class V. You also said :

"In years and years of paddling I have yet to be able to judge which missed line will kill you and which one won't."

I couldn't agree more. Alot of times its amazing what bad lines people get away with, but then one that looks not so bad ends up tragically.

ras-
you may be right that kayaking has not been marketed as well as it could be but I'm not sure I really want it to be marketed better. I like that I am rarely wait in a crowded eddy and that I see boaters I know all the time. I'm not trying to be elitist here, I just like it how it is. I'm all for kayaking resorts so long as they don't cost more than free camping.

Holy crap, I can't believe its only November. I can't wait for spring.
 
I have seen the guide lines that the ACA uses for teaching beginners to paddle and that is part of what made me start thinking about how kayaking is taught, that and talking to several Instructors about their methodology. It seems to me that the ACA has a set list of skills to learn but no real method about how to approach teaching them.
Okay Ras- seeing(reading) the ACA guidelines and experiencing them through ACTUALLY learning them is a BIG difference. You seem to be an expert on something you have never even experienced. You know nothing about ACA and its methods! As a matter of fact, I received an email from a ACA instructor trainer about this post who thanked me for my acknowledement of ACA, and then said " I think its funny that RASDOGGY wants to change the industry without ever experiencing the industry standard. Those are the ones to look out for. I say that because it means they donÂ’t have a bunch of structured experience. Newbies. I think its important not to re-invent instructional progression."

This instructor is part of a group of people who DO understand how to teach kayaking. These people have been ACTUALLY teaching and helping the sport progress for a very long time. ACA teaching methods have evolved as the boats have evolved. My first ACA certification was way different compared to re-cert I took 3 years later. Your instructor sources who tell you about their methodology might need to re-certify. REMEMBER- not everyone is a good teacher.

Ras- You do have some valid points. However, you have lost a lot of credibility in my book. You need to ACTUALLY experience something before you snap a judgement about it!



NEXT--

About Kayaking not growing due to no resorts, That was brought up at the WW symposium in Glenwood and I think that is not a valid point. First kayaking doesn't lend it's self to a resort setting like skiing does unless its from a playboat stand point. But it can be looked at like this, Colorado does have 3-4 kayaking resorts already in place. Durango, Buena Vista/Salida and Glenwood Springs, you can include Golden in this too. The Industry just needs to realize this and market it this way. Rivers already in place and hotels in place resturants there too, even camping, sounds like a resort to me. And it seems to be working for the Rafting company's.
DUH! It IS a valid point. You even made it valid by what you said. You are right about everything being in place for a resort type place, so maybe the industry would grow if somebody stepped up and created this. BTW- BV, Salida, Durango don't have kayak resorts. They have playparks with a instructional shop nearby...big difference. I think you are missing the point about what a resort is.

About Snowboarding growing due to the Mtn Dew/X games mind set that is just not true, the Ski resorts used to not allow snowboarders and they were seeing a decline in dollar/numbers that were going to resorts that allowed boarding, dad and mom skiied but the kids snowboarded so that was a no brainer for the resorts. Then when the Olympics turned up their nose at Snowboarding and Skateboarding the X Games were born.
I don't think it was THE ONLY reason snowboarding grew, but I think it was a BIG part of the equation. I even stated this in my post about it not being the ONLY thing. You are trying to twist my words! What do you think the X-Game's did to the image of snowboarding? My guess, is that it helped the sport grow. It gave it an image, and made it what it is today. What did resorts do after they realized this sport was growing so much? They built parks to capture this growth. Creating an image is so important. I would question your idea of what you think the kayak image should be; if you were around to experience the Scuba industry in the 70's my guess is that you are mid to late forties. I highly doubt you understand what creating an image really means. Especially if you are preaching "Slalom is the way to get kids involved." That is just STUPID! Kids are attracted to an IMAGE. Just look at what they wear, it correlates to who they are trying to be. There are some very influencial kayakers who are trying to make this image happen, you will see sometime in the future about what I am talking about.


Look Ras - I like your intentions for the sport, and I don't doubt you are making a difference to the paddling community. Thanks for that! HOWEVER, I doubt your actual knowledge of the kayak industry. My guess is that you have been kayaking at 1 or 2 years at best, how can you be an expert?

Later
Mark :)
 
This is my second season kayaking and I playboat and just started slalom. First, I do agree that slalom isn't the best way to get kids and teens involved, but I do not believe that the reason is the gear. Slalom is fun to watch ONCE YOU KNOW WHAT IS GOING ON!!!!! I mean, if you don't know any thing about the pattern or gates demarcations, how fun is it to watch them going through what appears to be random gates? While if waching a playboater that kicks butt do flips, spins, blunts, etc... is a lot more fun because you don't really have to undestand what is going on, you can just admire the fact that they can do that. Also, in the group i am in, it is required that you be able to roll before entering the beggining slalom level. Second, I believe a solid roll or swim, as the case may be, improves a boaters confidence alot. Rolls are a major thing to learn because they provide a way to avoid hypothermia, bruising, or both in one session. However, a roll is a hard skill to learn, I took the firt two levels at the local kayak school last year and came out with a rock solid swim and a loathing of t-rescues. My instructor in the second level ended up resorting to putting my grabloop in the boat to force me to roll, a failed effort. That winter, I went to the local gym for open kayak nights and finally got my roll... seven or eight months after my last class. A few weeks after my onside became rock solid, I began work on my offside independent from instructors with only the knowledge that if I missed it, I could do my onside. Swims on the other hand are an easier skill to master and even the knowledge that you can get to the shore in one peice is very reassuring. I also agree CUgirl that learning balance is a big deal

Andi

P.S. I am a 15 year old girl
 
Jmack, good points. And yeah, we may have to agree to disagree.

On a last/general note, I think that most paddlers (including myself in some ways) would prefer to believe that class III is less deadly because it means that we can relax more on easier whitewater (although this is relative to the paddler). If we knew that we were less likely to get into trouble on class III than on class V then it would be much easier to evaluate our personal risk, and to control the environment in which we paddled. I just don't think it works out that way.
 
Discussion starter · #54 ·
First off NOWHERE in ANY of my posts did I claim to be an EXPERT and NOWHERE did I say I wanted to change the way teaching is done. I was asking if anyone had any ideas about changes they would like to see in the way they were taught.
If you reread my posts you will see several referances to me claiming to be invloved with whitewater for just this past season. Everything that was written was as an impartail observer new to the sport of whitewater kayaking, talking to other kayakers and non kayakers about the sport.

I have been involved with the sports of sea kayaking and sit on top for quite afew years as a couple of resorts that I taught SCUBA at did intros and tours with these style of boats and we taught boat diving from sit on tops where we taught basic strokes/paddle use.

Also you will read that I am comparing the teaching methods of kayaking to that of teaching SCUBA and after teaching SCUBA for over 20 years and being involved with the growth to the level it is at today both retail and instructional, and teaching Instuctors to be Instructors I do think I know something about instruction methods.
Also running a well established retail dive center I know a little about marketing a fringe sport that is thought to be dangerous by the people not involved.
I don't mean to imply that teaching kayaking is the same as teaching SCUBA, but getting customers and keeping them is the same in either sport.

You know nothing about ACA and its methods! As a matter of fact, I received an email from a ACA instructor trainer about this post who thanked me for my acknowledement of ACA, and then said " I think its funny that RASDOGGY wants to change the industry without ever experiencing the industry standard. Those are the ones to look out for. I say that because it means they donÂ’t have a bunch of structured experience. Newbies. I think its important not to re-invent instructional progression."
I have attended at least couple of dozen kayaking classes as an observer watching what was taught and how, with the intention of becoming an Instructor. By doing so I should have been exposed to the Indusrty standards.
Maybe it was some of the Instructors involved not teaching to the standards set by the ACA or maybe they didn't care about their students learning the skills and were there for the money or to work on their playboating skills.
BUT I could see how improvements can be made to the teaching of basic kayaking skills to improve students grasp of the basic skills and there for making the return rate and enjoyment level of said students higher.
Mostly this has to do with students that were not getting it, myself included. And the students that don't get it are the ones that don't come back bringing their friends and support the local shops or ACA or AW or anything else that has to do with the business of kayaking.
This is what I was paid to do in the SCUBA Industry watch Instructors and help them with ways on how to teach standard skills better.

To all Instructors or anyone from the ACA out there that has an issue with what I am saying feel free to contact me at rasdoggy2@aol.com I look forward to hearing from you.
 
RASDOGGY- I am not going to debate or argue with you over ACA methods. You need to actually go experience their program before you criticize it. Observing some lessons taught by a institutional shop is not the same as actually learning from ACA. Maybe these shops or instructors need some improvements.

Also, I am done debating you about growth of kayaking. You have no credibility. Sea Kayaking, Scuba, and rec boating are completely different sports. You have been WW kayaking for maybe 2 years, and I doubt you really understand the industry.

Good luck with your agendas.

Mark
 
ACA

Mark,

Becareful lumping all ACA instruction as equal quality. I've seen first hand how some current ACA instructors refuse to except modern techniques. Simple things like not leading the boat with your eyes during a sweep stroke or refusing to teach spin momentum. All because they're still teaching in Dancers and RPM's.

I've also worked with some of the most progressive ACA Instructors on the planet. People like Sam Drevo who are working to reform the ACA from the inside out.

PS: If you just swam in the last part rapid right above a large pool. Grab your stuff and swim to shore. If you swim above the rapid? Drop that shit and start the overhand sprint. Swim it like you mean it.
 
Don
I agree with you about the ACA old schoolers. I have heard of these instructors. I have been fortunate to take both of my ACA classes with the progressive group, and am also friends with one of the guys who is one of the leading instructor trainers for progressive development at ACA. In one of my posts I believe I said ACA is (OR SHOULD BE) up to date. I also made sure to empasize, not all instructors are good teachers. And, to add to that: Kayak shops that offer lessons should be up to date with their instructors as well their methods. If some guy is still teaching the old school methods, it would make me believe that he hasn't re-certed in the past few years.

BTW- I scanned both a ski mag and a kayak mag today. You couldn't be more dead on about the marketing.

Peace :D
Mark
 
Rasdoggy-
I have been thinking a little more about your posts. And, I want to apologize for being kind of harsh towards you. You have some valid, credible, and good points. I don't agree with all of them, but I respect most of them.

Later
Mark
 
I went on my first river in a kayak in 1998. I have been to a LOT of classes and seen a lot of different methods of teaching. I would like to become an ACA certified instructor eventually- after all,I teach about every other sport I do. I think that will be a goal for next season.

Most of the instructors I have had are ACA certified. They all teach differently. It is the same with PSIA certified ski instructors (I'm one)- we all have our own style and methods of teaching. I love hearing about and seeing how other instructors teach. I think every instructor or person who aspires to be an instructor can learn a lot from learning how other people teach. It makes us all better instructors I think.

So, I want to thank you, Rasdoggy, and everyone else for this topic, I think a lot of great points have been brought up.

I am sure everyone has heard about coloradokayakers atleast once or twice or a million times this season. right? :roll: For me, this group has helped me become many times more confident and more passionate about the sport. Organizations that provide newer kayakers with support and paddling partners probably do more for the sport than anything- PPWC, CWWA, and our unofficial little group (www.coloradokayakers.com) help people CONTINUE with the sport after trying it out, and thus support the industry.

I didn't paddle in any rivers from that first time in 1998 until 2002 because I couldn't find anyone at my level to paddle with. Having organized groups and places to go to find partners is essential for the sport... making sure that, as instructors and shops and groups, we help new customers/paddlers find the support they may need to continue in the sport is the best thing we can do to help this sport grow and help people who are trying to make a living doing what we love succeed in that endeavor.

My 2 cents :)

Lauren
 
camonia-
you just singlehandedly managed to talk me out of taking ACA courses by comparing their instructors to PSIA trained skiers (i've known a few cool ones but most still remind me of Aspen Extreme).......thanks for the warning...

-aaron
 
41 - 60 of 77 Posts