Initial impressions: I liked it but didn't love it. I think it tried to be too many things. A buddy river video, an expedition video, a river documentary, a science video, a tribal documentary...but it was none of those things on their own and it didn't weave them very well together.
I liked the individual footage. The interviews were generally good, but it had jarring transitions between interview footage and river footage.
I really really really enjoyed the Howard Dennis interview. I think a movie could be shot with all tribal storytellers telling their own stories all the way down the river and it would be incredible. [[Me too! Howard's perspective and thoughtful insights were greatly appreciated.]]
Yet the cameos with the senior white river guides was 'meh'. So..there are lots of senior white river guides and we've heard most of their stories..which are interesting but detracted from this movie. [[As a point of clarification, Noel Richardson, who is interviewed in Lodore, was never a river guide. He's my best boating friend and I asked him to help row a raft for us and he agreed. He's a wonderful story teller and was a solid member of the crew.]]
I didn't understand the interview with the artist. He talked about it like an unfinished "project" but we never saw any finished art. [[Patrick Kikut was the lead artist for the expedition. Prior to launching, Pat and 7 other artists created a wide variety of artwork which was on display at four different museums throughout the basin. After the expedition, Pat created 18 more oil paintings and has contributed artwork to three different publications. If you want to see two of his large paintings in person, you can visit me at my shop in downtown Laramie, WY. They are gorgeous.]]
It was interesting that J.W.Powell was vilified a couple times in the movie. I don't think he was a flawless individual for sure, but I also feel he was vilified for things that he actually tried to do right. He tried to warn the growing American government that there wasn't enough water in the west, yet he also headed up the fledgling USGS and helped draw the map that people used to move west. He was painted in the movie as a foe to the natives, yet he founded the bureau of ethnology and tried to help them tell their story.
There are FAR worse villains who weren't mentioned...like General George Crook, General Nelson Miles, or Kit Carson who actively pursued the Government's genocidal policies or later Floyd Dominy who was the architect of the free-flowing river's destruction. [[Powell's role was the focus as the 150th anniversary of his expedition offered us the opportunity to retrace his route and consider the many challenging issues facing water in the West for the next 150 years. We worked to foster dialogue about current relevant issues facing the basin and its users rather than focus too much on the past.]]
I was confused by the planting of beans scene. What?
And the footage on the two swimmers did little for me. For a river documentary, it just distracted from the main storyline.
Is this a good movie for an uninformed viewer?
Have I read too much, did I expect too much?
I think I'm going to re-watch it. There's a lot to unpack and discuss. [[Thanks for your thoughts and for taking the time to view it. Much appreciated.]]