Contentious Grand Canyon Tramway Meeting Held Today - Mountain Buzz
 



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 11-10-2016   #1
 
Tom Martin's Avatar
 
Flagstaff, Arizona
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 920
Contentious Grand Canyon Tramway Meeting Held Today

RRFW Riverwire – Contentious Grand Canyon Tramway Meeting Held Today
November 10, 2016

On November 10, 2016, the Navajo Nation NAABIK’YTI’Committee (pronounced Nay-Bit-Chay) held a work session at the Twin Arrows Casino to review legislation authorizing the construction of a massive new tourist development on the rim of the Grand Canyon. Called the Naabi committee for short, Naabi is the Navajo Nation leadership committee and is comprised of the entire Navajo Nation Tribal Council.

Today’s standing room only meeting was intended to review the pros and cons of legislation proposed to build a huge development on traditional grazing lands of the Navajo Nation. The project includes construction of a highly controversial tramway to the bottom of the Grand Canyon to be developed by a small Phoenix developer called Confluence Partners LLC. The Partners LLC has never constructed anything of this scope before.

During the informational meeting, two Native American’s were escorted out of the room by Navajo Nation Tribal Police for interrupting the meeting. One person was in support of the project, and a second person supports a tramway-free Grand Canyon.

The tramway legislation was introduced by Council member Ben Bennett on August 29, 2016, and must be reviewed by four Navajo Nation Committees before coming to a vote by the full Tribal Council. The first committee to review the bill, the Law and Order Committee, voted unanimously to oppose the legislation.

The Naabi meeting started with a lengthy review of the development given by Albert Hale, who is one of the Confluence Partners. Hale was elected Navajo Nation President in 1994, serving until 1998, when he resigned after being charged with over 50 felonies and misdemeanors for theft and bribery.

As part of the presentation, it was stated by the developer that river runners camp at the Confluence and that newlyweds spend their honeymoon night at there.

After the developer’s presentation, a number of Council delegates spoke about the project and asked questions of Hale. While some of the delegates spoke in favor of the project, almost all of the delegates who spoke had some serious questions concerning flaws in the legislation.

These concerns ranged from the small amount of royalties awarded to the Tribe to missing information and misinformation provided by the Partners. Other concerns raised included the need to override existing Navajo law and that the Navajo Nation would be saddled with a number of financial obligations not clearly stated in the legislation. Delegates pointed out that the legislation requires disputes between the Partner group and the Nation to be held in Phoenix Arizona’s Maricopa County.

One delegate noted the Chapter where the Tram would be built had barely passed a resolution in favor of the project. “The community is split 50-50” noted Delegate Otto Tso as he addressed the Phoenix Developers. “Why don’t you build this in your own backyard” he told them. Delegate Tso also asked for a third party review of the entire project, including the LLC’s financial projections.

A number of people who came to the meeting live where the development would be located. They had been told they would be able to address the delegates, but were not allowed to speak. At least two Council delegates brought this issue up, decrying the fact that the Partners group was allowed to speak at length, but that local Navajo who were against the development were not allowed to voice their concerns to the delegates.

No vote was taken on this matter at today’s meeting as it was for informational purposes only. The legislation is now scheduled to return to the Resources and Development Committee for its November 15 meeting. The time and location for that meeting has yet to be announced.

River Runners for Wilderness still encourages its members to write to the Navajo Nation and Secretary of Interior Sally Jewell. Tell the Nation and Secretary Jewell with all due respect:

-You are opposed to Navajo Nation Legislation 0293-16

- You support a tramway-free Grand Canyon.

- Ask that Navajo tribal funds be spent on vital needs such as housing, sanitation, telecommunication and water supply projects across the entire Western Navajo lands.

- Remind the Navajo Nation and Secretary Jewell of her duty to work with the Navajo to protect and preserve the Grand Canyon as the 1975 Grand Canyon Enlargement Act required.

You can send your comments to the Navajo Nation here:

[email protected]

Or in writing, mailed to:

Tom Platero
Executive Director
Office of Legislative Services
P.O. Box 3390
Window Rock, AZ 86515

Navajo Nation law requires that all comments, either in the form of letters and or e-mails must include your name, position title, address for written comments and a valid e-mail address. Anonymous comments will not be included in the Legislation packet.

Please cc Secretary Jewell here:

By e-mail: [email protected]

Secretary of the Interior
The Honorable Sally Jewell
Department of the Interior
1849 C Street, N.W.
Washington DC 20240

For further information, please contact Tom Martin at River Runners For Wilderness, [email protected]

Additional information is also available here:
http://savetheconfluence.com/

Photo: Naabi Work Meeting, Twin Arrows Casino, by Tom Martin
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~
RIVERWIRE is a free service to the community of river lovers from River Runners for Wilderness. To sign-up for future Riverwires, send an e-mail address to [email protected] and we'll add it to the RRFW Riverwire e-mail alerts list.

Join RRFW's Facebook discussion group to stay abreast of and participate in the latest river issues. It's as easy as visiting https://www.facebook.com/groups/raftgc/

Join RRFW's Yahoogroup discussion group to stay abreast of and participate in the latest river issues. It's as easy as sending a blank e-mail to [email protected]

Check out RRFW's Rafting Grand Canyon Wiki for free information on Do-It-Yourself Grand Canyon rafting info http://www.rrfw.org/RaftingGrandCanyon/Main_Page

Check out new items and donate at the RRFW Store! RRFW is a non-profit project of Living Rivers. https://www.rrfw.org/store
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~

Tom Martin is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 11-11-2016   #2
 
willieWAO's Avatar
 
Denver
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 157
I DO NOT want a tram, however Whitey should have been more cautious when trading booze for land, and giving those people that particular section. Regardless of how greedy the developer is, it is those peoples choice of what they want to do with the land. How Sad indeed. Let the 'zzards feast,
willieWAO is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Topic Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Grand Canyon Tramway Meeting Rescheduled Tom Martin Boaters Forum | General Boating Topics 1 10-04-2016 03:44 PM
Grand Canyon Tramway Bill Introduced Tom Martin Boaters Forum | General Boating Topics 26 09-03-2016 06:54 PM
RRFW Riverwire Grand Canyon Tramway Update Tom Martin Whitewater Rafting 0 02-12-2016 03:32 PM
Tramway-Free Grand Canyon needs 11 more signatures Tom Martin Whitewater Kayaking 7 12-25-2012 01:55 PM
Grand Canyon Tramway - Just Say NO Tom Martin Whitewater Kayaking 4 12-15-2012 03:06 PM

» Classified Ads
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.