Possible future of the Green River formation - Mountain Buzz

Go Back   Mountain Buzz > Other Chatter > The Eddy

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-20-2013   #1
Denver, Colorado
Paddling Since: 1999
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 861
Possible future of the Green River formation

"Drillers in Utah and Colorado are poking into a massive shale deposit trying to find a way to unlock oil reserves that are so vast they would swamp OPEC.

A recent report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office estimated that if half of the oil bound up in the rock of the Green River Formation could be recovered it would be "equal to the entire world's proven oil reserves." "

An American Oil Find That Holds More Oil Than All of OPEC - ABC News

marko is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 02-21-2013   #2
Roy's Avatar
Denver, Colorado
Paddling Since: 1993
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 682
Possibly relevant aspect of oil shale development to regional whitewater enthusiasts...

Development of oil shale resources will require significant quantities of water for mine and plant operations, reclamation, supporting infrastructure, and associated economic growth. Above-ground retorting typically consumes between one and five barrels of water per barrel of produced shale oil, depending on technology.[7][25][26][27] For an oil shale industry producing 2.5 million barrels per day (400103 m3/d), this equates to 105,000,000–315,000,000 US gallons per day (400,000–1,190,000 m3/d) of water.
I've a suggestion to keep you all occupied...learn to swim!
Roy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2013   #3
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 786
I know Shell was sitting on a bunch of Yampa water rights waiting for the opportunity to access this oil when the technology improved that it made sense financially. These rights were challenged, and Shell eventually had to give them up. So the oil companies are very aware of the need for this water to drill in this area. Shell was just trying to get in before the price went up. The one benefit to our water laws is that they prevent a company like Shell from just collecting water rights without putting them to beneficial use.

The fact of the matter is that when it makes sense financially to go after this oil the oil companies will get the water rights necessary to make the operation work. I'd like to think that there was something we could do to keep this water in the river, but there is so much money sitting in the shale that its hard to imagine that anything could stop this from happening. I just hope the farmers that currently hold these rights are smart enough to make these companies pay top dollar.
BrianK is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 02-27-2013   #4
Lake City, Colorado
Paddling Since: 1990
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 133
we do need more oil.
doughboy is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Topic Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nuclear Plant- Green River,UT- river/water use APPROVED coloradogem Whitewater Kayaking 10 01-27-2012 02:33 PM
NOAA River Flows w/ future cast brendodendo Whitewater Kayaking 1 05-20-2009 10:56 AM
future of river running? peak Whitewater Kayaking 14 11-30-2007 11:44 PM
Off Topic: Formation of a Cameron Pass BSA Chapter rsmiller Whitewater Kayaking 0 05-09-2007 07:10 AM
Formation of a Cameron Pass BSA Chapter rsmiller Winter Buzz 0 05-09-2007 06:56 AM

» Classified Ads
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.