Playpark Class IIIs Disclaimer - Mountain Buzz
 



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 09-24-2015   #1
 
Grand County, Colorado
Paddling Since: 2011
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 28
Playpark Class IIIs Disclaimer

I have noticed that whitewater playpark class III rapids are easier than natural class III rapids.

Do you agree?

Should playpark III's have a special rating like 'PPIII' ?

It's a little deceiving when someone learning to master a class III, practices at a playpark and then goes into the real world and gets clobbered.

It doesn't seem like the rating system is totally universal.

kayak bunny is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 09-24-2015   #2
 
Swank's Avatar
 
Aurora, Colorado
Paddling Since: 2009
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 251
I tend to agree but don't think more ratings are necessary.
Swank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2015   #3
 
bystander's Avatar
 
Sacramento, California
Paddling Since: 2012
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 312
Not all Class 3's or 4's or what ever are equal in difficulty. Even in nature. Some are easier than others. From the vids I've seen, playparks tend to look very low on technicality and more straight forward than many natural rapids.
bystander is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 09-24-2015   #4
 
InflatableSteve's Avatar
 
Cave Creek, Arizona
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 688
I have done the Durango park a couple of times. I agree that the rapids are more forgiving, but I guess you have to look at each feature and break it down. Even though they are easier to navigate (I assume they do this on purpose for safety reasons), I defiantly wouldn't down grade them. The size of the waves and holes are bigger than class ll in my opinion. Besides I figure it is better to overestimate the rapid than underestimate it.

The class system is not exact. Each rapid changes with flow, and every boater has there own idea of what they would rate the same rapid. I also think adding more exceptions will just make things more confusing.
InflatableSteve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2015   #5
 
lmyers's Avatar
 
Buena Vista, Colorado
Paddling Since: 2005
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,766
I look at play parks as freestyle features not whitewater parks, unless they have a slalom course or good gradient...but really class 3 varies significantly between drainage size and location. I could take you on a half dozen class 3 runs in this region, all with noticeably different character.
lmyers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2015   #6
 
Durango, Colorado
Paddling Since: 1996
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 818


You should probably steer clear of our playpark, little bunny.
jmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2015   #7
 
Steamboat, Colorado
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 609
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmack View Post


You should probably steer clear of our playpark, little bunny.
Haha! Awesome vid. Silly rafters.
__________________
It's a good day to be a duck....
soggy_tortillas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2015   #8
KSC
 
KSC's Avatar
 
Boulder, Colorado
Paddling Since: 2003
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,104
How about DIII = Durango Class III?

I don't really get the original question. If it's less than class III, why not rate it II, II+, whatever. I think you're just coming back to the classic debate about difficulty of move vs. consequence which gets conflated in the standard rating system. Playparks tend to be sanitized so there's less consequence. First swiftwater class I took w/ Mike Mathers - he was saying that people are learning bad rescue habits in the PPs: standing up, etc.
KSC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2015   #9
 
Durango, Colorado
Paddling Since: 1996
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 818
Seriously though, it all comes down to the fact that whitewater ratings are pretty useless. We take several subjective variables like pushiness, technicality, hazards and commitment, all of which can change based on weather, water level and wood, and try to cram them into a system of 5 numbers. I would worry less about what class a river is, and pay more attention to getting a reliable description before deciding if a new run is for you.

And you are all welcome to come experience our Class IV playpark. Its a pretty good time when the water is up.
jmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2015   #10
 
azpowell's Avatar
 
page, Arizona
Paddling Since: 2014
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 203
jmack i got on the town run this year when it was at 4200cfs, the park as a whole is definitely a class 4 during high water. cant wait to get on it next year, hopefully it doesn't peak while im down the grand.
azpowell is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Tags
ark, class ii, class iii

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Topic Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Class IIIs - making a "resume" heliodorus04 Kayaking | Trip Planner 14 03-20-2007 03:04 PM
Class IV and Class II kayaking trip in Ecuador this January SWA Commercial Posts 0 12-05-2006 05:39 PM
Colorado IIIs tellutwurp Whitewater Kayaking 15 05-02-2006 08:08 AM
Glenwood Springs class IIIs heliodorus04 Whitewater Kayaking 4 08-08-2005 02:19 PM
North St Vrain-- Class II run and Class III+ run Arn Whitewater Kayaking 0 06-28-2004 01:57 PM

» Classified Ads
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.