Oregon loses the Upper Rogue to landowners - Mountain Buzz
 



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 07-08-2010   #1
 
malloypc's Avatar
 
Albany, Oregon
Paddling Since: 2002
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 260
Oregon loses the Upper Rogue to landowners

Judge rules the Upper Rogue is not navigable:

State loses decision on ownership of portion of Rogue | MailTribune.com

Interesting considering all the boats on it these days.
The ruling was based on the use (lack of) for commerce in 1859.

Jerry

malloypc is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 07-08-2010   #2
 
Stoner, Colorado
Paddling Since: 2007
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 93
It looks as though (from the article) that this just affects access to the banks not actually floating the river. "If the river remains listed as non-navigable, river users could face heightened restrictions on access to the river banks, although the river itself would still be open to the public."
Ikedub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2010   #3
 
The Mogur's Avatar
 
Oregon City, Oregon
Paddling Since: 1972
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 497
Ike is right. Nothing was lost. The issue of navigability in this context relates only to ownership of the riverbank. In a non-navigable stream, property lines can extend to midstream--but the river itself is still a public resource (although ranchers have been known to string fences across creeks and rivers).

In a navigable waterway, the river bank up to the mean high waterline is public in most, but not all, cases. (I own Willamette Riverfront property, and my ownership goes to "the usual low waterline," grandfathered-in way back in the 19th century).

But Oregon has been conducting its own crusade to establish public ownership of the riverbanks throughout the state, using the navigability of the waterway as the easiest way to accomplish that. If they are successful, then they think they won't have to deal with trespassing complaints by riverfront property owners.

In reality, it only creates MORE trespassing complaints, because it is impossible for passers-by to know where the "mean high waterline" is. Oregon actually spends many, many thousands of taxpayer dollars sending a Department of Transportation aerial photographer all over the state to photograph rivers at high water, so that they can mediate trespassing disputes.
The Mogur is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Topic Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lake Creek and landowners TimWalker Whitewater Kayaking 6 05-15-2007 05:44 PM
Upper Klamath, Oregon Billpaulings Whitewater Kayaking 4 11-06-2005 11:02 PM
Dumba*s loses paddle on Lawson/Dumont mthurman Whitewater Kayaking 1 06-06-2005 07:06 AM
Colorado Landowners bhodizypha Whitewater Kayaking 0 05-25-2005 12:09 PM
"band of nine landowners" claim to own the Elk Riv danielle Whitewater Kayaking 14 05-25-2005 08:19 AM

» Classified Ads
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2020 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.