Proof Requested - Mountain Buzz
 



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 08-30-2012   #1
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,002
Proof Requested

Hi,

In another post here, as well as on the RRFW listserv, Tom Martin, the head of River Runners for Wilderness, made the following claim:

"...concessions passengers seem to be doing more than one river trip a year."

I'd like to know a couple of things:

1. Does Tom have actual proof for that assertion?

2. If proof exists, could Tom provide a copy of any letter or other communication RRFW sent to the appropriate authorities, conveying relevant information, so that a proper investigation could be initiated?

Just asking...

Rich Phillips

richp is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 08-30-2012   #2
GoBro
 
glenn's Avatar
 
BZN, Montana
Paddling Since: 2008
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,493
It seems the proof of concept has already been established. Outfitters aren't checking id's. You won't get much more proof than rumor beyond that until someone is actually caught.
glenn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2012   #3
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,002
Hi Glenn,

Proof of concept is a nice turn of a phrase, but it has its limits.

In concept, you could be driving without a license. But you wouldn't want to get fined simply because someone told the highway patrol that you might be doing it. Conceptually, a lot of chemical substances might possibly be consumed on the river, but that potentiality isn't actionable.

Look, Tom is a talented, experienced, knowledgable fellow. He's done -- and continues to do -- a lot for the boating community. Nobody denies that.

But just because this is the internet doesn't mean he or anyone else can throw out allegations of unlawful conduct without being ready to prove them. And if he has that proof, then wouldn't you expect him to have provided it to the proper authorities? After all, he's unabashedly anti-commercial, so you'd think he's do anything he could to make the case against them -- particularly with the Park authorities.

FWIW.

Rich Phillips
richp is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 08-30-2012   #4
GoBro
 
glenn's Avatar
 
BZN, Montana
Paddling Since: 2008
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,493
Quote:
Originally Posted by richp View Post
Hi Glenn,
Proof of concept is a nice turn of a phrase, but it has its limits.

In concept, you could be driving without a license. But you wouldn't want to get fined simply because someone told the highway patrol that you might be doing it. Conceptually, a lot of chemical substances might possibly be consumed on the river, but that potentiality isn't actionable.
That's why a licence is checked at all traffic stops, purchasing liquor, tobacco etc. It's pretty clear that due diligence would close the gaps and no one is being fined arbitrarily.

Quote:
Look, Tom is a talented, experienced, knowledgable fellow. He's done -- and continues to do -- a lot for the boating community. Nobody denies that.

But just because this is the internet doesn't mean he or anyone else can throw out allegations of unlawful conduct without being ready to prove them. And if he has that proof, then wouldn't you expect him to have provided it to the proper authorities? After all, he's unabashedly anti-commercial, so you'd think he's do anything he could to make the case against them -- particularly with the Park authorities.
As I said before, until someone is caught it is highly unlikely any real info will be brought forward. How do you know no one is working the system if you lack to safe guards to monitor potential scams?
glenn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2012   #5
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,002
Hi Glenn,

Actually, I don't think you and I are all that far apart. I personally think that rangers at the Ferry ought to check the IDs of all commercial passengers. I don't like it that they rely on some kind of certification that nobody on the trip has already done one that year. But the fact is, the check the rangers do of private IDs is pretty cursory, and also subject to some attempted skuldudgery.

What I'm getting at is something different. Tom has made a simple and clear declarative statement, implying systematic fraud by commercial passengers -- fraud that would entail some form of tolerance (if not cooperation) by the outfitters. All I'm asking is if he has proof, and if so, has he provided it to the proper authorities.

If not, then all he has is an unfounded supposition -- something that doesn't dignify him or his organization when he propagates it in public, in an attempt to sway opinion.

FWIW.

Rich Phillips
richp is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Topic Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Custom made bear-proof dryboxes birdman83 Commercial Posts 0 06-21-2011 12:34 PM
Water Proof Detergent? Porkchop Winter Buzz 4 12-14-2009 11:18 AM
Proof that Obama is ruthless! yarmonymatoid The Eddy 83 06-24-2009 04:11 PM
proof that kayaking's for pussies danger Whitewater Kayaking 9 09-27-2007 03:17 PM
Feedback on ZG 54 requested kayakerroy Whitewater Kayaking 2 03-29-2005 08:29 PM

» Classified Ads
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.