m3 vs burn - Mountain Buzz

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-03-2008   #1
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 783
m3 vs burn

So I just broke my M3 in that wonderful paddling destination of Arizona and I need a new creeker. I really liked the M3 and it helped me step up my game, but they don't make them anymore so Im looking at the burn or anything else that might be similar. I like chines in a creek boat also the m3 boofed well, was fast enough, and was very forgiving. What are the main differences between the burn and the M3 and are there any other boats you might recommend. Thanks.

BrianK is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 02-03-2008   #2
peterB's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 569
and he lobs one in low and outside

My only experience with the burn was this summer on the Crystal Gorge. My friend dislocated his shoulder and I paddled my Jefe down to the portage then hiked back up and paddled his Burn down the same stretch right afterwards. I can't say that I appreciated much about that boat. I found it uncomfortable, hard to turn, and not enough volume. I was very glad to be back in the Jefe but in general I like my chines on the play boat.

friend of the fork, knife, and spoon
peterB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2008   #3
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,303
I've owned both.

To be brief and basic, the burn is an amazing boat with sharp edges. This makes it extremely fast, helps it to hold a line well, and it performs beautifully in pushy whitewater. Boofing is identical between the two boats. The M3 was slightly more forgiving on really shallow creeks because the edges didn't grab as much when grinding over rocks. That said, the Burn does fine on runs like SSV, Bear Creek and other mank fests. The Burn excels on runs with deep pools like the Big South, and big water like Gore and NF Payette. The more water and less rock grinding the better the Burn performs. It accelerates quickly and holds a line well. Much like the M3, you have to pick your line in advance, since once it gets on a line it likes to stick to it, and doesn't want to make drastic changes.

I love the boat. It's a perfect upgrade to the M3.
Kyle McCutchen
Cutch is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 02-04-2008   #4
Bozeman, MT
Paddling Since: 2000
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 107
Ive owned two M3s, and got the chance to paddle the Burn in Ecuador for a day. I agree with cutch, the Burn kicked ass on runs with water, where your interacting with holes, and not rocks. Its way faster than the M3, and really zoomed through those holes. I had a tendency to over turn it, because when you floor it, the boat really responds, just something to get used too. I was very intrigued, because I liked it, but am a little hesitant to pick one up because it doesnt seem very forgiving on shallow runs, and big drops. I guess it depends on what style of creeking you prefer, Id be stoked to own it if I had a quiver of creek boats, but Im broke, so I aim for a good all around creek boat(M3), you know good on low volume, medium volume, big water, boulder gardens, slidey stuff, bump and grind, etc! I used to own an H3 as well, and felt the M3 was a step up towards steep, shallow creeking. The burn may not be considered a true creeker, but Im sure youd love it on runs like Fish Creek, Gore, etc!

Oh bye the way has anyone tried the new Everest?
progers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2008   #5
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 443
I have a wavesport z and a dagger rmp that would be great for everything you are looking for. I am willing to give them to you for free if you come pick them up. If not I am going to sell them to the highest bidder. My starting price is a thirty rack of pbr.
paulk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2008   #6
caspermike's Avatar
Bozeman, Montana
Paddling Since: 1999
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,507
caspermike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2008   #7
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 783
Thanks for the help. The fact that the burn doesn't do well in mank is a concern. I don't really go out seeking rocky runs, but its colorado and it happens more often than I d like.

Paul, Ill get those boats out of your yard soon, patience is a virtue.
BrianK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2008   #8
Gary E's Avatar
Jackson, Wyoming
Paddling Since: 94
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 745
Send a message via Yahoo to Gary E
The burn paddles great in all the sh^t. It's tough to figure out at first, once you do it's awesome. Cutch justs sucks at kayaking.

Gary E is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2008   #9
Arkansas during the off-season Nomadic during the summers! :), Arkansas & Colorado
Paddling Since: 2006
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 950
My 2 pennies worth.

I think the Burn is awsome and handles lines very well...Yes it did take a couple runs to figure it out but I'm very happy with my burn I bought last year and I'll be buying another in a few weeks!
gannon_w is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Topic Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Burn L or jefe? aztecus Whitewater Kayaking 7 12-05-2007 11:21 PM
Magnum or Burn perropirana Whitewater Kayaking 4 09-01-2006 01:12 PM
the burn is KILLING IT!!!! kurfothich Whitewater Kayaking 43 05-11-2006 07:02 PM
Pyranha Burn Schizzle Kayaking | Gear Talk 1 05-10-2006 09:07 AM
Anyone else ever burn-out? Caspian Whitewater Kayaking 28 04-26-2006 09:29 PM

» Classified Ads
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:42 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.