NRS 132D versus 130. Diminishing Tubes? - Mountain Buzz
 



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 09-29-2016   #1
 
Asheville, North Carolina
Paddling Since: 2012
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 2
NRS 132D versus 130. Diminishing Tubes?

A 132D came up on craigslist today and I am meeting the guy tonight. Good price but I have never heard of Diminishing Tubes until today. I trust the NRS brand and considering the 132D won several awards I assume its a good boat.

Am I even going to notice a difference between the standard Expedition and the 132D? Wanting to set it up as a gear boat with the occasional family outting on local III-IV. Is there really anything different about it that is worth mentioning over the tried and true NRS expiditions. How much does the reduce kick affect the performance?

jakeller449 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2016   #2
 
Quiggle's Avatar
 
Summit County, Colorado
Paddling Since: 92
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 95
One of the companies I have worked for had many of all three (E130, E132D, E136). The E132D will definitely "plug" in to wave and holes and will bath tub on you much quicker than the other two. When I was paddle guiding I prefered the 132D because it made for a wetter ride (Class 3&4). The extra kick is nice on class 5, it won't bath tub as quick. The E132D will track as well as the others too.
hope this helps
Quiggle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2016   #3
 
Asheville, North Carolina
Paddling Since: 2012
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 2
Thanks, how do you think it would do with a frame? Does it tend to stop in holes more so than the E130 or are they about the same as far punchability?
jakeller449 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2016   #4
 
Quiggle's Avatar
 
Summit County, Colorado
Paddling Since: 92
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 95
It still punches, still great with a frame, a little less room for gear in the back but you can get creative. I own an otter, very comparable
Quiggle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2016   #5
 
Salt Lake City, Utah
Paddling Since: 1998
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 30
I have an older 16' Nez Perce that i run oar rigged. I like the diminished tubes for hauling ability. There is a noticeable difference between full tubes and diminished in the amount of gear you can fit. I don't think I carry any more than I would but my gear pile is lower, and I think that helps in windy conditions. I think it tracks and runs about the same as any other raft. You do get more water in the boat, but that just means I get to soak my kids and wife occasionally, so that's a win.
Obviously, there are some differences, but if it's a good price, I wouldn't let that dissuade you. It will be a great gear boat for sure.
altaholics is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Topic Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
So new RMR Cat tubes or used JPW Cat tubes? Swank Rafting | Gear Talk 6 03-17-2015 09:18 PM
Diminishing tubes or not? kazak4x4 Kayaking | Gear Talk 2 04-26-2010 12:20 AM
DRE Pro Cat 14x24 tubes vs Aire Ocelot 14x22 Tubes nosrednakram Kayaking | Gear Talk 26 03-10-2009 10:59 AM
Diminishing Tubes Good or Bad?? Eagle Mapper Whitewater Kayaking 7 11-22-2008 01:52 PM
Best boat for the Grand Canyon for a small paddler? 130 lbs Parkito Whitewater Kayaking 1 09-19-2005 12:41 PM

» Classified Ads
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.