Originally Posted by hojo
I played around with riverbrain several years ago. Was very thin back then.
At least for Colorado rivers it's getting a lot better. My point is, it's a good interface, it's just lacking that amount of data it needs. To add a run and a gauge it takes all of 1 minute. If everybody threw up their favorite missing local run, we'd have a massive database overnight. The guy operating it is very active improving and fixing it. I think this is the right model and allows the river information to easily evolve with the rivers themselves.