Go Back   Mountain Buzz > Other Chatter > Winter Buzz

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-27-2007   #1
Charc in = charc out
ToddG's Avatar
Seattle, Washington
Paddling Since: 1992
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 475
Dangerous conditions in the BC backcountry

In the off-chance that any of you folks are headed north for some shred, here's fresh info on persistent gnarly backcountry conditions in the mountains of coastal & interior BC. definitely worthy of consideration:


"Over the past month I've been watching the snowpack very closely--both
while guiding earlier in the month and now producing the Public Avalanche
Forecasts for the Canadian Avalanche Centre for the past week or so.

There has been a steady and escalating series of incidents in the last 5-7
days. Skiers have been and continue to accidentally trigger avalanches and in many cases, are getting caught in the slides they trigger. So far,
everyone has been lucky and has escaped without serious consequences.

In the last 48 hours I'm aware of the following notable incidents:

a.. A size 2.5 avalanche which had extensive old tracks in the bed surface.
b.. A three-person, partial burial involvement with non-life-threatening
injuries to one skier in a size 1.5
c.. A size 2 skier triggered soft slab that propagated through an area
below a steep cliff that generally sees a lot of self-stabilization from

d.. A partial burial when a skier accidentally released a slide onto his
partner below.
e.. A snowmobiler who triggered a slide, was fully buried, and was rescued
by his partners.
f.. A size 3 skier triggered avalanche that ran to valley bottom, "snapping
trees" as it went.

These are just the notables. There are numerous other human and natural
triggered avalanches that make for several pages of data from the last
couple of days. These events were largely in the Columbia Mountains but
also include the Northwest and Purcells. If we go back a few days, pretty much all other regions have seen similar events. And these are just the ones I personally know about.
This is a classic scenario which, in the past, has often culminated in an
unfortunate and serious accident.

The avalanches and incidents we are seeing have been on a variety of
aspects and elevations. The details would require an extensive discussion but, in brief, the avalanches we have seen involve storm snow interfaces from the last snowfall and wind event as well as several crust, facet, and surface hoar layers which formed in late January/early February and then were subsequently buried between Feb 2 and Feb 8, depending on location. Since Feb 10th or so a metre or more of new snow has further buried the early February layers.
It's an extremely tricky situation in the Cariboos, Purcells, Columbias,
Northwest (North Coast and inland coast mtns), South Rockies, and to a
growing extent, in the Kootenay-Boundary region. The South Coast appears better-maybe someone with local experience of what's going on there can comment. I suspect that areas with a warmer, wetter climate (e.g. coastal areas) will improve more (and more rapidly) than interior ranges. Again, some local commentary would be welcome. I suspect that this condition is just starting to develop in the main ranges of the Rockies where the February layers exist but are not yet as deeply buried so do not have the load or slabs that we are seeing elsewhere--perhaps less low elevation surface hoar there? any locals willing to comment?
I've been in the avalanche business for over 25 years and it's been a long
time since I've seen a condition this complex and variable. In the last 24
hours, the words "low confidence", "spooky", "tricky", and "suspicious"
have been used in relation to snow stability and avalanche hazard. It's seldom that people actually take the time to pick up the phone or write us an email about conditions, but there's an increasing number of calls and messages coming in to the CAC office; a very real indication of concerns and a desire to get the message out about the problems we are facing.
We are now entering a period where things are going to start looking
better. Cool temps, reduced winds, and lack of new snow will cause a slowing of and perhaps will even stop significant natural activity. Human-triggering of avalanches will become more sporadic and difficult.
However, I urge everyone to remember the underlying condition still
exists: storm snow instabilities in the alpine and wind affected areas will
linger for a day or two yet. And the early February layers bring to mind
the immortal words of Monty Python: "he's not dead-he's just sleeping." You most definitely do not want to tickle the deeply buried instabilities and have them wake up on a slope your are riding. There's now up to 120cm of snow available to avalanche on these layers and that snow is settling into a firmer slab layer that could well propagate much farther (making for
larger, more destructive avalanches) than what we've seen in the slow, subtle, and steady buildup over the last 7-10 days. The size 3, skier triggered avalanche that ran to valley bottom yesterday is evidence of just this kind of condition.
The biggest problems we are dealing with are deeply buried, persistent weak layers. While the low elevation surface hoar is getting much of the
attention, I think in some cases the February layers have not yet begun to
perform to their maximum potential (facet layers in the alpine for
example?). In some cases these persistent layers will almost certainly hang around for some time yet, napping for a while then waking up with new snow, wind, temperature changes, strong solar radiation, or if the right human trigger comes along at the right place and the right time.
I may be (and hope) I'm wrong, but am concerned we will see increasingly
large avalanches on slopes that have been previously tracked up, on
moderate angled slopes which have not yet avalanched in the most recent cycle, at low elevations on surface hoar layers, at higher elevations on old facets and crusts (even after current storm instabilities settle out), and in the trees where even a small slide can produce serious consequences if you get raked through the timber.
I think we are in a period where we all need to think very carefully about
what we are doing and why we are doing it. Here's some things I think can
help decrease risk-this is what I'll be doing when I head back out into the
mountains next week:

a.. Be very cautious in areas where you do not have good local knowledge
about past use and avalanche history of a slope; you probably need to know what's happened since about Feb 2 anyway.

b.. Choose safer terrain with options for travel on:
>a.. low angle slopes (less than 25 degrees),
>b.. in dense trees,
>c.. on smaller open slopes, and
>d.. away from terrain traps such as creeks, gullies, cliffs, and sudden transitions from steep to flat.

c.. The best choice, if you insist on riding more aggressive terrain and do
not have local knowledge, is to ride on slopes that have avalanched
recently and are not yet reloaded with new or wind-blown snow (can you still see the fracture line?).

Up to about Feb 10 we experienced a great winter with generally very good stability. That has all changed and we need to change our thinking and our approach for the next while and perhaps for the rest of the winter if we are to come out of the season unscathed.
Post to/read the ACMG Mountain Conditions Report
(http://www.acmg.ca/mcr/default.htm ) and on the Canadian Avalanche Centre's public forums (http://www.avalanche.ca/Forums/), talk to your friends and others while out in the mountains, feel free to forward this to others, and go ahead if you want to post this in other public forums; we need to get the word out. Given the spate of incidents that doesn't seem to be slowing down, I'm worried that folks aren't getting the message or seeing the trend.
These are my personal thoughts and do not necessarily reflect the opinion
or position of my employers or the professional organizations of which I am a member. Your comments and feedback are welcome. Feel free to email me: kklassen at avalanche.ca if you think I'm dead wrong, if you have information that is of use in helping others, or if you have data that
supports these ideas.
Safe travels.
Karl Klassen

ACMG/IFMGA Mountain Guide

Public Avalanche Forecaster, Canadian Avalanche Centre

>Revelstoke, BC"

ToddG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2007   #2
Steamboat, Colorado
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 458
Hey what's up Todd! Thanks for posting that. Just got back from a week of skiing in interior BC (Rogers Pass). Stability up there had been on an improving trend all week until the recent mild temperatures (Friday, 2nd). So with the recent mild temps we got to experience a healthy wet avi cycle this Sunday and Monday on all aspects and elevations. Pretty cool.

Anyway, we found the best skiing to be above treeline. And while the Feb 4th layer is obvious on the sheltered aspects below treeline our tests were non-reactive on that layer.

Typical scenery shot from Canuckastan. Not bad, eh:

Well, believe it's time to start boating now....
frenchy is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Topic Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Backcountry Bash: Support your backcountry! kristyn Winter Buzz 0 11-30-2006 02:54 PM
Dangerous wood in Foxton! soylent green Whitewater Kayaking 3 07-23-2006 06:56 PM
Dangerous Encounter at the Mystery Canal RiverWrangler Whitewater Kayaking 5 03-29-2006 06:57 PM
Dangerous question De la Boot Whitewater Kayaking 111 10-05-2004 07:59 PM
A Real dangerous Question erdvm1 Whitewater Kayaking 9 09-23-2004 07:52 PM

» Classified Ads
RMR 13' w/ Drop Stitch...

posted by Riverboat Works

Floor Model RMR 13' SB with Drop Stitch Floor Option and...

Wavesport Fuse 56...

posted by SummitSurfer

Wavesport Fuse 56 "Medium" barely used in great condition. ...

14' AIRE Wave Destroyer...

posted by River Capt D

AIRE 14' x 22" dia. Wave Destroyer cat tubes, purchased...

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

Our Communities

Our communities encompass many different hobbies and interests, but each one is built on friendly, intelligent membership.

» More about our Communities

Automotive Communities

Our Automotive communities encompass many different makes and models. From U.S. domestics to European Saloons.

» More about our Automotive Communities

Marine Communities

Our Marine websites focus on Cruising and Sailing Vessels, including forums and the largest cruising Wiki project on the web today.

» More about our Marine Communities

Copyright 2002-2012 Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.