Traverse 10 vs Karma RG - Mountain Buzz
 



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 02-15-2017   #1
 
Jacksonville, Florida
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 4
Traverse 10 vs Karma RG

Hello everyone this is my first post here.

Some background, I currently live in Florida and do fresh and salt water kayaking in springs, rivers, salt marshes and some coastal. We are planning some lazy river trips this year to Buffalo National River, French Broad to Hot Springs, north to Acadia and then Dry Tortugas (ill probably use a SOT or sea kayak for that one) Even my SOT is a Jackson Kraken for the bigger water.

I've been looking at a 'smaller' boat that is still 'fast' for fun camping trips, the RG seems a potential good fit since its a bit more 'sea kayak' but the traverse 10 huge hatch may make fitting in gear a bit easier. I was an ultralight backpacker for years so I dont need much but i like my beer space.

Is the RG that much more 'coastal friendly' and faster to make it a clear choice for me to hit the lazier rivers and springs of the South but still capable of milder rapids I'll get when I go to NC over a traverse 10? Or is the traverse 10 with larger hatch not that much different of a boat and just as capable?

Trying them first down here is tough to impossible, there are some RGs around here and there but the Jackson dealer mostly sells SOT and Tupelos and has to order the boat for me so I get one shot at this.

To add to it, we may move in a year or two and move up near Asheville/Hot springs.

Thanks

eress_pnter is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 02-17-2017   #2
 
peterholcombe's Avatar
 
Where ever the water is...., Colorado
Paddling Since: 1996
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 452
Send a message via AIM to peterholcombe
I've got both an RH and Traverse 10. I really like them both but they do have a few differences.
Here is a list:

RG: fast, lots of storage, better for salt and longer distances of flat water. Comfortable, stable, tracks great with skeg down.

Traverse: much more like a normal creek boat. Easier to turn in hard WW.
Still lots of room for overnights. Same skegg, super stable.


Sent from my iPhone using Mountain Buzz
peterholcombe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2017   #3
 
Jacksonville, Florida
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 4
Thanks for that input! RG sounds like it be a better choice for me for local and travel use combined.
eress_pnter is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Old 02-19-2017   #4
 
Dave Frank's Avatar
 
Boulder, Colorado
Paddling Since: 1995
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,758
I confess to owning both of these boats, but not having enough cockpit time in either.

I've run them both on class 4 and easy 5 whitewater.

Everything Peter says is spot on, but the main thing that makes me personally prefer the Traverse is the higher deck height for how I like me knees to feel in a boat. I find the UL/RG to have too low a deck for comfort. Removing the seat pad helps with this, but detracts from the "cush" factor big time.
__________________
Dave

(seven two 0)-298-2242
Dave Frank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2017   #5
 
WW Family's Avatar
 
Longview, Washington
Paddling Since: 2004
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 30
I have an RG and love it. Our son got an Unlimited a few years ago and raced it in the Northwest Creeking Competition and that was class IV-V. The RG is the same hull design as the unlimited but with a hatch and skeg.I have to admit, for me I like to get places and do as little work as possible and my RG is great on flat water and class III-IV. A bit heavier than my creek boat, but a lot less work on the flat stretches of water and pretty comfy on long trips. This is a GREAT Rogue River boat and I am sure it would be great on the Grand Canyon.
WW Family is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2017   #6
 
Jacksonville, Florida
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 4
how is the unlimited in flat/slow water where I 'should' be using a sea kayak like lazy rivers and salt marshes? Would it be actually be slower then something like a kraken 13.5 sot with potnetial longer waterline wise?

the size helps alot for pickup truck carry over the ritual on 17 foot boats.
eress_pnter is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Topic Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Jackson Traverse v XP Remix 10 TonyK Kayaking | Gear Talk 2 07-05-2016 01:11 PM
JK karma traverse bobbuilds Kayaking | Gear Talk 5 09-13-2015 02:49 PM
Karma S or M ?? Ken Vanatta Kayaking | Gear Talk 5 06-28-2013 09:14 PM
Karma Canada Winter Buzz 22 01-30-2010 02:05 AM
Backcoutry ascent and traverse tools for snowboarders Meng Winter Buzz 10 11-26-2004 09:44 AM

» Classified Ads
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.