|
Ahem,
Mr. Compassionate....
Perhaps before you go slinging your cartload of intellectual insults, you might want to check that attitude at the door (which is quite obviously the same place you left your 7th grade grammar textbook) and go re-read your post. As "obvious" as Mr. Bastard's purported lack of economic insight may be to you, it's clear to me that *some* folks around here are lacking even the "most rudimentary knowledge" of sentence structure and the English language. (Isn't this the same thing you conservatives are so swift to throw screaming tantrums over with immigrants? Their lack of understanding of, and/ or inability to correctly use our language....? But I digress.....)
It's quite clear to me that one grumpy conservative was most likely out back smoking pot (with the same liberal hippie kids he's so quick to insult and "put in their places" today) the day the nice lady with the short skirt and long legs stood in front of his bland little suburban classroom and tried to teach a room full of bored youth all about dependent clauses and prepositional phrases. You see, Conservative, if that weren't the case, I would assume you might've otherwise learned a thing or two about making a prepositional phrase agree with its object....
"You may not look like such an imbecile with a little education"?
Hmmm.... actually, it's not Mr. Bastard who looks like an "imbecile with a little education," my friend. I'll let you guess, however, who *does* look like the moron with a limited education. Otherwise, that person might've thought to structure their sentence so that our token "imbecile" was modified by the condition of his education, rather than described as having a small one.
BTW, if you need some help figuring out how it should read, it's: "With a little education, you may not look like such an imbecile," preferably followed by the words "after all"-- thus indicating to your reader that the imbecile's education would be enhanced as a result of completing the task at hand.
|
Linear Mode
