| I personally liked the old flows as they were sorted by drainage, not alphabetical, and it was easier to make sense of what was happening geographically with tributaries etc. I agree with Dan, too much info in once clustered space.
It would be nice to have links to both a simple flows page that was color coded like the old one, and keep the run descriptions separate.
The other problem with the eddyflower flows is that there are a number of gauges that don't work (poudre), lots of "visual", and some empty spots. Day to day during kayaking season, the flows page is probably what we use the most. Making it user friendly and simple like the old one was top notch and the interface did not need to be improved in my opinion.
I think a potential improvement would be listing the low, medium, and high levels so that folks can see what the values for the color coding are.
Bring back the flows! |