Forums
Flows
Snow
Swap
Photos
Events Links Contact




Go Back   Mountain Buzz > Whitewater Boating > Boater's Forum

Quick Links
Buzz Forums
Home / Portal
Forum Listings
Safety Alerts!
Boater's Forum
Betty Buzz
Trip Planner
The Eddy

Photo Gallery
Creeking
Rodeo & Freestyle
Snow Riding
Member's Albums
Upload Photos
Classified Ads
Whitewater Kayaks
Kayak Accessories
Rafts/Accessories
Other Boats
Skiing & Boarding
Want Ads
Industry Jobs
Place an Ad



Sponsored Links


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-12-2007   #11
rivergod

Profile: 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 37
Snow-tell analysis graphs

I've noted that the link on the flows page takes you places that haven't been updated since last year. Here is a new equivelent link...

http://www.co.nrcs.usda.gov/snow/sno.../swe_hilo.html
  Reply w/Quote
Old 01-12-2007   #12
paulh
 
paulh's Avatar

Profile:  Denver, Colorado
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 164
Images: 1
I'm hearing you guys loud and clear. Not a problem, we'll work on it and have something up in a week or two for more feedback.

Any suggestions on improving the old model?
  Reply w/Quote
Old 01-12-2007   #13
DanOrion
 
DanOrion's Avatar

Profile:  Indian Hills, Colorado
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 627
Images: 4
Have a 3-day running average flow along with the instanteneous. I ususally look at the graph to see if flows are coming up or dropping down, this would save me a step. Having both flows, however could be confusing for some.
  Reply w/Quote
Old 01-12-2007   #14
sj

Profile: 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 400
By Drainage and what Dan said please. sj
  Reply w/Quote
Old 01-12-2007   #15
latenightjoneser
 
latenightjoneser's Avatar

Profile:  steamboat, Colorado
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 200
Images: 12
You might cross-reference CRC I and II to get all the runs up.

I don't see Steamboat town run (Yampa @ Stmbt) on the list. Maybe I missed it.

You could add the Slater Creek

http://nwis.waterdata.usgs.gov/co/nw...cd=00065,00060


Elkhead Creek

http://nwis.waterdata.usgs.gov/co/nw...cd=00065,00060

and Little Snake gauges

http://nwis.waterdata.usgs.gov/co/nw...cd=00065,00060

These may be obscure, but who cares.

Also, you don't have to change the Eddyflower page if you creat a column that listed "Drainage". If you could click on the heading and sort by drainage, that would do the trick for me.
  Reply w/Quote
Old 01-12-2007   #16
deepstroke
 
deepstroke's Avatar

Profile: 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 139
Images: 6
Another vote for categories by drainage. I'd also like to see the Northern N.M. runs previously listed be part of the default setting. Not the scenic floats on Eddyflower, but the goods- Embudo, Pueblo, UTB, LTB, Pilar.
  Reply w/Quote
Old 01-12-2007   #17
craporadon

Profile: 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 127
Images: 6
Barrel Springs is listed as medium, maybe it's medium if you're GI Joe. There's about 40 cfs in there. If you can get the reading for the SHoshone Power Plant and subtract that from Colorado at Dotsero you would have the flow in Barrel. X-cel energy probably has that info available. If they don't have real-time they would have historical and you could just make a spreadsheet of average historical and subtract that.
  Reply w/Quote
Old 01-12-2007   #18
craporadon

Profile: 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 127
Images: 6
Paul

The site looks pretty sick. The name is not very though, maybe there could be 2 versions, Eddy FLower and Bad Ass Nigga's on the River. Anyway I tried to search California Class V+ and it crashed. That is pretty much the most important search in the Western US, your site should stick that one. Plus your Montana section is pretty weak. Overall I'm impressed.
  Reply w/Quote
Old 01-12-2007   #19
GoodTimes
 
GoodTimes's Avatar

Profile:  Pueblo West, Colorado
Paddling Since: '78
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 193
That's funny shit crapo. I like it.

Just another vote for "by drainage".
  Reply w/Quote
Old 01-12-2007   #20
badkins

Profile:  slacker
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 444
Images: 22
good concept but it needs a lot of work

Yeah I'll second the vote for getting rid of all the visual guages. No need for them. Removing all the duplicate gauges would also clean up a lot of the clutter, have one gauge linked to several runs instead of each run indavidually linked to the same guage. Or something like that. Maybe you could add a link to the "classic" flow page. Same comments for the PDA flow page, honestly way too cluttered. The one feature I really do like is to filter by level. Then the gauges are listed descending from the highest levels.
  Reply w/Quote
Post Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Topic Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gunnsion flows through Black Canyon / gunny Gorge Update deepsouthpaddler Boater's Forum 2 10-12-2006 03:32 PM
Ark Flows? COUNT Boater's Forum 1 07-28-2006 11:12 AM
Flows from Gr. Mt. rwhyman Boater's Forum 1 07-10-2006 06:06 PM
Flows Page Not Working!? alexhenes Boater's Forum 2 07-06-2006 03:30 PM
Why are most of the South Platte stream flows not updated? dvc Boater's Forum 2 04-02-2004 03:35 PM

Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:29 PM.

Other Social Knowledge forum communities:
Cooking Forum - Sailing Forum - Early Retirement
Airstream Trailer Forum - Aquarium & Reef Forum
Royal Forum - Book and Reader Forum - Yoga Forum
Volkswagen Touareg Forum - Jeep Wrangler Forum
Whitewater Kayaking & Rafting Forum - Yoga Forum
U2 Forums
Social Knowledge Networks
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0



eXTReMe Tracker