Originally Posted by rasdoggy
I am wondering why boaters chose to do either one. What are the reasons to go barefoot? Doesn't it make sense to wear booties in case of self rescue or to help others? Not condeming just wondering?
booties all the way, preferably ones with a sole, river socks don't count in my book, unless park-n-play in a manmade park.
I've seen a guy go barefoot on Gore Canyon. He said that his feet couldn't fit into his playboat as well with booties, or even socks. At the put-in he said that if he swims he is too busy or cold to feel any rocks that he hits his feet on. He also said that he can slip on his Tevas (clipped in the back of the boat) in just a few seconds if he needed to rescue someone.
Well.... Later that day the same guy swam Kirshbahm Rapid... All of it. And his boat was pulled out 1/2 mile or so below. Not only did he bang and cut his feet, he had to walk all the way to his boat. There is no trail here, just rocks. I forget if his tevas were still there, clipped in or not.
So much for machismo. He was a humble puppy.
He wasn't in my group. Just a group that we leapfrogged throughout the day. I try not to boat with irresponsible people like this. If I had been pinned that day and needed to be rescued, I would want my buddies to respond ASAP, not having to stop and put on tevas for 5 or 10 or 30 seconds while I am holding my breath, getting cold and losing energy or by now already drowned and needing CPR because I ran out of time 5 seconds ago... 5 seconds that would have been enough if they had on booties. I know that thought would haunt me if a buddy died because the responders were boating barefoot.
I feel pretty strong about this subject as you can tell from my post.